Mary A. Davis v. Criterion Casualty Company

Good Law
73 F.3d 368·1995 WL 759452·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40800
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 199594-36141California1,720 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mary A. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRITERION CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-36141. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 7, 1995. * Decided Dec. 22, 1995. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Mary Davis' ("Davis") automobile insurance policy with Criterion Casualty Co. ("Criterion") was canceled on December 22, 1992, when Davis failed to make a premium payment. Upon subsequently purchasing a new car, Davis went to Criterion on January 12, 1993 to reinstate her policy. She paid the initial premium for the new policy by check, which was deposited by Criterion on January 13, 1993. On January 20, Criterion sent Davis a welcome letter and information about her policy (which, the letter stated, was effective January 13). 3 On January 28, 1993, an uninsured driver hit Davis. Her policy covered, inter alia, injuries caused by uninsured…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.