In Re Robert J. Futoran, Debtor. Robert J. Futoran, M.D. v. Dayle Futoran

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Robert J. FUTORAN, Debtor. Robert J. FUTORAN, M.D., Appellant, v. Dayle FUTORAN, Appellee. No. 94-56240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 12, 1995. * Decided Dec. 20, 1995. 1 Before: FARRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Robert J. Futoran appeals the District Court's order affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court. We affirm. 4 He contends that the Bankruptcy Court erred in finding that the indemnity provision in his Marital Termination Agreement covers the bankruptcy Trustee's claim against the $290,000 spousal support buyout payment. 1 The Bankruptcy Court's findings of fact are reviewed for clear error and conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Tucker, 989 F.2d 328, 330 (9th Cir.1993). The Bankruptcy Court did not err in finding that the indemnity provision covers the Trustee's claim. 5 Even if the language of the…