Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company v. Operadora Dulcinea M/y Dulcinea, and David M. Salentine

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OPERADORA DULCINEA; M/Y Dulcinea, Defendants-Appellants, and David M. Salentine, Appellant. Nos. 94-15610, 94-15701. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. Decided Dec. 20, 1995. Before: SNEED, PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In these consolidated appeals, Operadora Dulcinea ("Operadora") appeals the district court's dismissal of its claim to personalty sold with the Motoryacht Dulcinea, and grant of a protective order against its deposition of Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.'s ("Boston") loan officer; and David Salentine, Operadora's former counsel, appeals the district court's imposition of sanctions upon him under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927 . 3 We affirm the dismissal of Operadora's claim and the grant of a protective order. We reverse the award of sanctions under Sec. 1927 for lack…