Caldwell v. United States

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence Daniel CALDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Michael E. Amend, Inspector, United States Marshals Service, Baltimore, Maryland; Don M. Lamb, Deputy Marshal, United States Marshals Service, Portland, Oregon, individually and officially, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-35485, 93-35974. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence D. Caldwell, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment, following a jury trial, in his action alleging that defendants executed an illegal search in violation of the Fourth Amendment and retained seized property in violation of the Fifth Amendment. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. A. Retention of Currency 3 Caldwell contends that the district court…