Birklid v. Boeing Co.

Good Law
73 F.3d 368·1995 WL 759208·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40817
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 199593-35965California422 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 368 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Theresa BIRKLID, et vir.; Von Bui, et vir.; Shane Michael Collins, et ux.; Wilma Mae Ebhard, et vir.; Karin Christel Fleckenstein, et vir.; Joseph Manuel Gonzales, et ux.; Heidi Marie Guevara; Deanna Henry; Joann Marie Johnson, et vir.; Beverly Jean McCormick; Ronald Hugh Palmer; Bonnie Faye Schrum, et vir.; Kathleen A. Torres, et vir.; Rory Alan Wintersteen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOEING COMPANY, a Washington corporation; Ferro Corporation, an Ohio corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35965. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. Submission Withdrawn Dec. 1, 1994. Resubmitted Dec. 11, 1994. Decided Dec. 22, 1995. Before: WOOD, * HUG, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** The plaintiffs in this case are present or former employees of the Boeing Corporation, who contend that they suffered injuries resulting from their ongoing exposure to a toxic chemical in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.