Pool

Pool v. VanRheen

Good Law
297 F.3d 899·2002 WL 1602470
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 2002No. 00-35997California4,980 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rhoades, J.

Vera Pool appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on: (1) her fourth claim for relief against all remaining Defendants 1 for retaliation against Pool’s exercise of her constitutionally protected right to free speech under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ; and (2) her eleventh claim for relief against Defendant Multnomah County for retaliation under Oregon Revised Statutes § 659.030A(l)(f). 2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

I. Background

Vera Pool, an African American woman, began working as a corrections officer for the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office (“Sheriffs Office”) in 1970. Having moved up through the ranks to become a lieutenant, she ran for the position of Sheriff in 1994 and 1995 against the incumbent John Bunnell and Defendant' Dan Noelle. After a poor showing in the primary, Pool dropped out of the race and supported Noelle who won the election in May 1995. Sheriff Noelle then appointed Pool to the position of Commander of the Corrections Support Division. As Commander, Pool was in charge of records, the restitution center, the matrix system, close-street supervision and the jail intervention drug program.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.