Jorge Lopez-Carache v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

73 F.3d 369 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jorge LOPEZ-CARACHE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70234. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 29, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge Lopez-Carache, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, summarily dismissing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Sec. 3.1(d)(1-a)(i) (1991)) his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 Lopez-Carache contends the BIA erred in dismissing for his failure to specify the reasons for his appeal, because his "statement of reasons for his appeal was sufficiently detailed to allow the BIA to determine the nature of the error and to guide the…