Harden v. Collins

73 F.3d 369 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Betty HARDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Norbert E. COLLINS, MD; Norbert E. Collins, MD, Inc.; Renae Smith, RN; Sylvia Kearney, CRNA; Fern L. Armbruster, personally and as owner/administrator of Silver Fern Homes, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55766. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 12, 1995. * Decided Dec. 20, 1995. Before: HUG, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Betty Harden appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Norbert Collins, et al. Harden asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1982, and 1985(3). She alleges that she was sexually abused while she was under the care of defendants for a facelift, and that the alleged sexual abuse and alleged taking of her medical records were motivated by racial animus. We find that there are no genuine issues of material fact and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 3 *…