Al Seckel v. Anthony Blumka, D/B/A Blumka II Gallery, Al Seckel v. Anthony Blumka, D/B/A Blumka II Gallery

73 F.3d 370 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Al SECKEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony BLUMKA, d/b/a Blumka II Gallery, Defendant-Appellee. Al SECKEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony BLUMKA, d/b/a Blumka II Gallery, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-55339, 94-55528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. Decided Dec. 20, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER & MEMORANDUM * 2 Al Seckel appeals the various district court decisions made in the course of a jury trial concerning a contract dispute in the sale of a 16th-century German clock. Anthony Blumka appeals the district court's denial of his motion for sanctions. We affirm the district court's decisions, and we sanction Larry A. Sackey for misleading this court during oral argument. MERITS 3 We have thoroughly examined the record and cannot identify any errors in the district court's summary judgment rulings or evidentiary rulings. We…