Hotman Tampubolon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

73 F.3d 370 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hotman TAMPUBOLON, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70486. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1995. * Decided Dec. 21, 1995. 1 Before: WALLACE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Hotman Tampubolon, a citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge's order denying his application for suspension of deportation. Tampubolon contends his deportation to Indonesia will cause him extreme hardship, and the BIA abused its discretion by not considering all the pertinent facts. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a), and we deny review. 4 Tampubolon seeks a suspension of deportation under section 244(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a). To qualify for a suspension of deportation, an…