Stephen v. Hewitt

Good Law
73 F.3d 370·1995 WL 762155·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40824
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 199594-56257California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 370 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jimmie Earl STEPHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.E. HEWITT, Correctional Officer, Calipatria Prison; James Gomez, Director of Corrections--Sacramento, CA; David Maschetti, President C.C.P.O.A.--Brawley/El Centro Branch; B. Prunty, Warden--Calipatria Prison; M.J. D'Arcy, Sergeant--Calipatria Prison; G. Trujillo, Lieutenant--Department of Corrections, Calipatria Prison; Breash, Correctional Officer; Ballard, Lieutenant; Tingley, Program Admist., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Jimmie Earl Stephen appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials in Stephen's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging a number of civil rights violations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.