Traver v. Weisberg

Good Law
73 F.3d 370·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 199595-35347California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 370 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John M. TRAVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randall WEISBERG; Judge of the Oregon District Court in his official capacity as Judge and individually; Harold Blank, Judge of the Oregon District Court in his official capacity and individually; George Covic; Frank Wall; Lisa Covic, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-36066, 95-35347 and 95-35657. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John M. Traver, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Federal district courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to review the final determinations of a state court in judicial proceedings "even when the challenge to a state court decision involves federal constitutional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.