United States v. Mariano Caudillo-Alvarado
Opinion
Opinion
73 F.3d 371 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mariano CAUDILLO-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50509. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 11, 1995. Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: BROWNING, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 On August 4, 1993, Mariano Caudillo-Alvarado was arrested at his residence and taken into custody. He had no prior criminal record. After being charged in a three-count superseding indictment, Caudillo filed a motion to suppress evidence. The district court denied his motion and the jury convicted him on all counts. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 15 years. 1 3 Caudillo argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to convict him of any of the charges alleged in the indictment. We review insufficient evidence claims by determining "whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…