United States v. Jose Arturo Miramontes-Castellanos

73 F.3d 371 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Arturo MIRAMONTES-CASTELLANOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-55232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 29, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Arturo Miramontes-Castellanos, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Miramontes-Castellanos contends that: (1) he was improperly sentenced as a career offender; (2) his counsel was ineffective on three grounds; and (3) the government breached the plea agreement. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo the denial of a section 2255 motion, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. Career Offender Status 3 Miramontes-Castellanos contends that the sentencing court erred by classifying him as a career…