United States v. Rodolfo Trujillo, AKA El Negro, AKA Alexander Quintana Ruiz

Good Law
73 F.3d 371·1995 WL 761909·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40873
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 199593-50827California1,040 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 371 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo TRUJILLO, aka El Negro, aka Alexander Quintana Ruiz, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50827. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1995. Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: ALDISERT, * FARRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodolfo Trujillo appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Trujillo contends that the delay of nearly seven months between his arraignment (September 8, 1992) and the commencement of trial (March 29, 1993) violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 (c)(1). As this issue was not part of Trujillo's Speedy Trial Act motion in the district court, it is waived. See United States v. Stone, 813 F.2d 1536, 1538…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.