United States v. Charles Jerome White

Good Law
73 F.3d 371·1995 WL 759458·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40867
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 199595-10206California1,076 words

Opinion

Opinion

73 F.3d 371 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Jerome WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10206. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 1, 1995. * Decided Dec. 22, 1995. Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Jerome White pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). The district court sentenced him to seven years in prison and three years of supervised release, and ordered him to pay $8,000 in restitution. White appeals the restitution order, contending that it constitutes an abuse of discretion because there was no evidence of White's ability to pay. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 , and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the judgment of the district court. I. FACTS 3 White pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in November 1994, and was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.