Wilson v. Gomez

73 F.3d 372 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ, Director, California Department of Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; JOHN W. GILLIS, Commissioner, Board of Prison Terms; BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-56762. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Mark Wilson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging the revocation of his parole following his prison term for one count of oral copulation with a minor. Wilson contends that his due process rights were violated during his parole revocation hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Perveler v. Estelle, 974 F.2d 1132, 1134 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3…