Watson

Watson v. County of Riverside

Good Law
300 F.3d 1092·2002 WL 1902271
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 2002Nos. 01-56214, 01-56298California1,706 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Silverman, J.

We hold today that a plaintiff who succeeds in obtaining a preliminary injunction can be deemed a “prevailing party” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1988 , even though he did not recover other relief sought in the lawsuit. We also hold that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it declines to assess against a defendant attorney’s fees incurred by a plaintiff in opposing a motion to intervene brought by strangers to the lawsuit.

I. Facts

Tracy Watson, a former Riverside County deputy sheriff, participated in a highly publicized vehicle chase that culminated in the arrest of certain individuals. Watson wielded his police baton during the arrest and was suspected of using excessive force. Upon returning to the sheriffs station, he *1094 was ordered to prepare a report of the incident. Watson alleged that he was denied the opportunity to consult with a lawyer prior to writing his report. Upon completion of his report, Watson was placed on administrative leave and eventually terminated.

Watson brought an action in the U.S. District Court alleging that the county and various individual deputies violated his Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by detaining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.