Lovell

Lovell v. Chandler

Bad Law
303 F.3d 1039·2002 WL 2022140
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 2002Nos. 98-16545, 99-15930, 98-16548, 99-15928California8,155 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fletcher, J.

In an underlying class action suit, part of which is still pending, the district court granted partial summary judgment for plaintiffs against the State of Hawaii (“the State”) on the issues of unlawful discrimination and general liability for compensatory damages under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 , and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (RA), 29 U.S.C. § 794 (a), based on the State’s exclusion of certain disabled people from its health insurance programs. See Burns-Vidlak v. Chandler, 939 F.Supp. 765 , 773 (D.Haw.1996). The class consists of disabled individuals who, but for their disabilities, would have been eligible for Hawaii’s QUEST medical coverage. The district court certified this class retroactively for the purpose of determining general liability for compensatory damages and prospectively for the purpose of determining liability for punitive damages. It did not certify the class for purposes of determining the amount of compensatory damages in individual eases. Instead, the district court directed the individual class members to file individual suits for such *1045 determinations. Two of those individual suits, filed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.