Central Delta Water Agency v. United States

Good Law
306 F.3d 938·2002 WL 31121081
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 2002No. 01-16172California6,738 words

Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Fernandez, J.

Dissenting:

Because I do not believe that Central Delta Water Agency 1 has demonstrated that it has standing, I respectfully dissent. What is significant here is the fact that the United States has not violated any law, rule, regulation, or contract. . Nor has it threatened that it will do so in the future. *954 There is not a scintilla of evidence of any kind of minatory behavior.

For its part, Central Delta has no right whatsoever to require that a certain amount of water be kept behind the New Melones Dam; likewise, it has no right to the water stored in that dam during the period of storage. It only has a right to have sufficient water supplied to maintain water quality downstream. That right has not been violated, and the government has no intention of violating it. Thus, this case is not at all like cases where some sort of wrongdoing has endangered the existing rights of a party. 2 Of course, when there is any kind of relationship between parties, it is always possible that somebody will not perform a duty someday. But if standing is to mean anything, we must not confer it upon those whose rights are not being affected at all, especially when their alleged antagonist…

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ.

OPINION

This case raises an important practical question regarding the doctrine of standing. It requires us to address the circumstances under which a party that fears that it will be significantly injured by another’s actions may bring a lawsuit to prevent the possible future injury. The dispute involves one of the most contentious issues in the western United States: the management of water resources.

BACKGROUND

The Central Valley Project (“the Project”) is the largest federal water management project in the United States. Originally authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1935, the project consists of 20 dams and reservoirs, 8 powerplants, and approximately 500 miles of major canals and aqueducts. The Project is located in the Central Valley Basin of California, which is roughly 400 miles long by 120 miles wide, and includes the major watersheds of the Sacramento and San Joaquin river systems. The two rivers meet at the Saeramento-San Joaquin Delta (“the Delta”), where the waters mix and then flow through the Carquinez Strait into San Francisco Bay, and ultimately, into the Pacific Ocean. Central Valley Project…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.