Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
309 F.3d 578
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 2002No. 00-71138California3,398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Paez, J.

Petitioner Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, Culinary Workers Union Local 226 and Bartenders Union Local 165 *580 (“the Union”), 1 petitions for review of a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) order dismissing its consolidated complaints against Hacienda Resort Hotel and Casino and Sahara Hotel and Casino (“the Employers”). The Board concluded that the Employers had not violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a)(1) and (5), in unilaterally discontinuing dues-checkoff after expiration of their collective bargaining agreements with the Union. The Union contends that, in the absence of a union security provision in the expired agreement, an employer’s obligation to abide by a dues-checkoff arrangement survives expiration of the contract under the “unilateral change doctrine” of NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962). Accordingly, the Union argues that the Employers committed an unfair labor practice in violation of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the Act when they unilaterally terminated dues-checkoff before bargaining to agreement or impasse. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.