Tipton-Whittingham

Tipton-Whittingham v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
316 F.3d 1058·2003 WL 141281
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 2003Nos. 01-56991, 01-57016California2,060 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION TO THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT

We certify to the California Supreme Court the questions set forth in Part II of this order. All further proceedings in this case are stayed pending receipt of the answers to the certified questions, or the declination of certification. If the California Supreme Court declines certification, we will resolve the issues according to our perception of California law.

The answers to the certified questions depend upon California law, and those answers may be determinative of the outcome of the present appeal. We find no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the California Supreme Court. The answers provided by the California Supreme Court to the certified questions will be followed by this court.

I. Caption of the Case

A. The caption of the case and the names and addresses of counsel are as follows:

*1060 B. The names and addresses of counsel are:

C. If this request for certification is granted, the City of Los Angeles should be deemed the petitioner on the certified questions.

II. Questions of Law to be Answered

We respectfully request that the Supreme Court of California answer the certified questions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.