Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman

Good Law
74 F.3d 932·96 Daily Journal DAR 743·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1059·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 199694-56355California4,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

74 F.3d 932 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,014, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8967 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 439 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 743 SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Seymour VIGMAN; Robert G. Holmes, Jr.; Aero Systems, Inc.; Martin Blumenthal; Nettie Vigman; Jay Dash; Harriett Dash, as personal representative of the Estate of Philip Dash; Jack A. Haber; Habers, Inc.; Haberico Inc.; Habers, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Trust, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56355. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1995. Decided Jan. 23, 1996. G. Robert Blakey, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana; Mark Riera, Shepard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellant. Jack I. Samet, Baker & Hostetler, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Robert G. Holmes, Jr. Steven Gourley, Gourley & Burstein, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees Jack A. Haber, Habers, Inc., Haberico Inc., Habers, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Trust. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: FARRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.