96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 494, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2853, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 802 United States of America v. Josh Christopher Plunkett

Good Law
74 F.3d 938
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 199695-30053California1,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

74 F.3d 938 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 494 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2853, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 802 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josh Christopher PLUNKETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. Decided Jan. 24, 1996. Christopher J. Schatz, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for defendant-appellant. Leslie K. Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Chief Judge WALLACE. WALLACE, Chief Judge: 1 Plunkett challenges his 46-month sentence of imprisonment, which was imposed after he violated the terms and conditions of his probation. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal of the sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 . We affirm. 2 * While serving an unrelated state sentence, Plunkett contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Bureau) and confessed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.