Martinez-Rodriguez

United States v. Martinez-Rodriguez

Good Law
1 F. App'x 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 2001No. 99-10584; D.C. No. CR-99-00786-RCBCalifornia362 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Manuel Martinez-Rodriguez appeals from his sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326 (a) and 1326(b)(2). His sentence included a sentence of imprisonment of 63 months which he claims was imposed in violation of the terms of the plea agreement.

The government agrees that the sentence was not in accordance with the terms of the agreement. It takes the position that if the district court accepted the plea agreement, it should not have imposed this sentence. The government contends, however, that the district court may have rejected the agreement and imposed this sentence instead. We agree with the government that on the basis of this record, it is not clear whether the district court accepted the agreement. We therefore remand for the district court to determine whether it accepted or rejected the agreement, and if the latter, to reinstate the indictment and permit defendant to withdraw his plea. If the district court accepted the plea agreement, then the parties agree the sentence was not in accordance with the agreement, and the court should resentence in accordance with the agreement.

In this case, the district court entered a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.