Garcia-Contreras

United States v. Garcia-Contreras

Good Law
2 F. App'x 755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 2001No. 99-10537; D.C. No. CR-98-00193-DFLCalifornia835 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Defendant Vidal Garcia-Contreras was indicted for a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), which prohibits being “found in” the United States after having been deported. He moved to dismiss the indictment, and the district court denied his motion. A jury found Defendant guilty, and the district court sentenced him to 88 months in prison followed by 36 months of supervised release. Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion to dismiss and from his sentence.

DISCUSSION

I. Because Defendant ivaived his appeal, his challenge to the validity of the underlying deportation proceeding fails.

A defendant charged with illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 may not collaterally attack the underlying deportation order if he or she failed to exhaust administrative remedies that were available during the deportation proceeding, including direct appeal of the deportation order. 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (d)(1); United States v. Estrada-Torres, 179 F.3d 776, 780 (9th Cir.1999). “Accordingly, a valid waiver of the right to appeal a deportation order precludes a later collateral attack.” United States v. Garzcu-Sanchez, 217 F.3d *757 806, 808 (9th Cir.2000). To be valid, a deportee’s waiver…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.