Anthony William Hazzard, Sr. v. City of East Palo Alto, a Municipal Corporation

74 F.3d 1245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony William HAZZARD, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16230. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. Decided Jan. 8, 1996. Before: NORRIS, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff Anthony William Hazzard filed this action against the City of East Palo Alto, Lieutenant Gregory Eatmon, Police Chief Burnham Matthews, City Manager Allen Parker, Officers Phillip Johnson, Matthew Spray, Thomas Alipio, Douglas Medina, and Reserve Officer Tracy Frey for violations of 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1983, and 1985. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on all of Hazzard's claims. 3 * DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY INTEREST WITHOUT DUE PROCESS 4 Hazzard alleges that he was deprived of a liberty interest without due process of law when Police Chief Matthews made public…