Cookie Dash v. Roche Laboratories Roche Dermatologics Roche Products, Inc. Richard Salit, and Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

74 F.3d 1245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cookie DASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCHE LABORATORIES; Roche Dermatologics; Roche Products, Inc.; Richard Salit, Defendants. and Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55814. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1995. Decided Jan. 11, 1996. 1 Before: ALARCON and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and QUACKENBUSH, * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiff-appellant Cookie Dash appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. ("Roche") in this products liability action. Dash contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment because there is a genuine issue of material fact whether Roche's warnings were adequate. We affirm because Roche expressly warned physicians prescribing Accutane that a possible side effect of its use is that it may cause persistent or permanent eye…