Paulino Feraren v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

74 F.3d 1245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paulino FERAREN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70040. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Jan. 3, 1996. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, LEAVY, Circuit Judge, and BAIRD, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Feraren seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (Board) denial of his application for relief from deportation based on extreme hardship. The Board had jurisdiction pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Secs. 3.1(b)(2), 242.21(a) (1995). We have jurisdiction over this timely application pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We deny the petition. 3 The Board's determination that Feraren failed to demonstrate extreme hardship pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1) is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. INS v. Jong Ha Wang, 450 U.S. 139 (1981) (Wang ). Feraren contends that the Board failed to consider adequately his poor health,…