Yin Fen Flores v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
74 F.3d 1245·1996 WL 5569·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38921
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 199694-70178California1,781 words

Opinion

Opinion

74 F.3d 1245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Yin Fen FLORES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70178. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 13, 1995. * Decided Jan. 5, 1996. Before: CHOY, BEEZER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER The petition for rehearing filed by petitioner Yin Fen Flores is granted, the court having considered the response filed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service thereto and petitioner Flores having filed a reply to that response. Also, simultaneously the opinion filed on September 26, 1995, 66 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir.1995) is withdrawn, and the attached memorandum disposition is filed in its stead. Before: CHOY, BEEZER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Yin Fen Flores, a.k.a. Eileen York, a native and citizen of Taiwan, appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of Flores's request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.