James Dixon Richard Hargett Leslie Eaton Charles E. McDermott David Pargas v. King County
Opinion
Opinion
74 F.3d 1245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James DIXON; Richard Hargett; Leslie Eaton; Charles E. McDermott; David Pargas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35937. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1995. Decided Jan. 2, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 James Dixon and other present or former fire investigators employed by King County, Washington, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of King County in the investigators' action for overtime compensation brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. (FLSA). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 The King County Fire Investigation Unit investigates all county fires of unknown or suspicious origin, suspected arson fires, and fires causing more than $10,000 in damages.…