Koepke v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.

74 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David M. KOEPKE, Plaintiff, and Richard A. Forster; Gary C. Jones; Raymond A. Oravetz; Robert M. Peckels; Jere C. White; James D. Williams; Joseph B. Zucht, II, Intervenors-Appellants, Kerry T. Furata; Gary L. Johnson; Ernest R. Procalo; Julie Ender Jackson; Terry B. Karch; David K. Kentala; Bruce A. Perret; Herbert W. Dunmeyer, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16153. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1995. Decided Jan. 19, 1996. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON, Circuit Judge, and THOMPSON, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 The district court originally had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331 . After the federal claim was dismissed, the district court exercised jurisdiction over the remaining state claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1367 . The two intervenor groups: Dunmeyer et al. (Dunmeyer) and…