United States v. Lourdes Salzer

74 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lourdes SALZER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1996. * Decided Jan. 16, 1996. Before: BRIGHT ** , SKOPIL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Lourdes Salzer was convicted of possessing and importing sixty pounds of marijuana from Mexico into the United States. She contends on appeal that the district court erred by (1) disclosing her witness list to the government, and (2) excluding certain proffered expert testimony. We conclude that no reversible error occurred. We affirm. 1. Disclosure of Witnesses 3 The district court disclosed the names of Salzer's potential witnesses following her ex parte request for court-issued subpoenas. The court explained to counsel that the witnesses were properly disclosed in anticipation of voir dire where prospective jurors were asked whether they knew…