United States v. Michael James Hall, United States of America v. John J. Hall

74 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James HALL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John J. HALL, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-10029, 95-10044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 1995. Decided Jan. 19, 1996. Before: NORRIS, BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 John J. Hall and Michael J. Hall appeal their convictions upon their conditional guilty pleas to one count of manufacture and possession with intent to distribute marijuana and one count of maintaining a place for the manufacture and use of controlled substances. 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 856(a)(1). The Halls contend that the district court erred in denying their motion to suppress, following a comprehensive Franks v. Delaware hearing. The Halls argue that a Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") agent intentionally made a false statement on a…