United States v. Juan Paul Robertson, United States of America v. Juan Paul Robertson

74 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Paul ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Juan Paul ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-50395, 92-50460. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 3, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM ** A. RICO A violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1962 (a) requires proof of the following elements: (1) a person receives income derived directly or indirectly from a pattern of racketeering activity; (2) that person uses or invests, directly or indirectly, any part or proceeds of such income in the acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of any enterprise; and (3) that enterprise is engaged in or its activities affect interstate or foreign commerce. A. Pattern of Racketeering Activity Robertson was convicted of Counts One through Four of the…