Gunn

Gunn v. California Department of Consumer Affairs

Good Law
3 F. App'x 641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 2001No. 99-16072; D.C. No. CV-96-1761-DFLCalifornia287 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Joan Gunn appeals pro se the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of her former employer, the California Department of Consumer Affairs, in her action alleging violations of the Ameri *642 cans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 , and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12900-12996. We dismiss.

Appellee contends that Gunn’s appeal should be dismissed for her failure to comply with Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2). We agree.

“If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to that finding or conclusion.” Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2). “When an appellant fails to supply a transcript of a district court proceeding, we may dismiss the appellant’s appeal or refuse to consider the appellant’s argument.” Portland Feminist Women’s Health Ctr. v. Advocates for Life, Inc., 877 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir.1989).

Gunn contends that the defendant did not provide evidence to support the jury’s verdict, yet Gunn has failed to supply this court with a transcript of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.