Gunn
Gunn v. California Department of Consumer Affairs
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joan Gunn appeals pro se the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of her former employer, the California Department of Consumer Affairs, in her action alleging violations of the Ameri *642 cans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 , and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12900-12996. We dismiss.
Appellee contends that Gunn’s appeal should be dismissed for her failure to comply with Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2). We agree.
“If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to that finding or conclusion.” Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2). “When an appellant fails to supply a transcript of a district court proceeding, we may dismiss the appellant’s appeal or refuse to consider the appellant’s argument.” Portland Feminist Women’s Health Ctr. v. Advocates for Life, Inc., 877 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir.1989).
Gunn contends that the defendant did not provide evidence to support the jury’s verdict, yet Gunn has failed to supply this court with a transcript of the…