Benitez-Farias
United States v. Benitez-Farias
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Miguel Benitez-Farias appeals a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and his sentence following his guilty plea of being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Benitez-Farias was sentenced to 120 months for each of the 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) convictions and to 110 months for the 8 U.S.C. § 1326 conviction. All of the sentences run concurrently. We have jurisdiction, 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a); 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm.
I
Benitez-Farias argues that the government suppressed information about the confidential informant (Cl) in violation of its Brady obligations. 2 We review Brady challenges de novo. See United States v. Vgeri, 51 F.3d 876, 880 (9th Cir.1995). To prevail on his Brady claim, Benitez-Farias “must show that (1) the evidence was exculpatory or impeaching; (2) it should have been, but was not produced; and (3) the suppressed evidence was material to his guilt or punishment.” United States v. Cooper, 173 F.3d 1192, 1202 (9th Cir.1999) (citations omitted).