Cruz-Burgos

United States v. Cruz-Burgos

Good Law
4 F. App'x 447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 2001No. 99-50227; D.C. No. CR-98-01290-WMBCalifornia344 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Nemias Cruz-Burgos appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Cruz-Bur-gos contends that his plea should be set aside because the district court failed to inform him in open court of the nature of the charges, as required by Fed. R.Crim. P. 11(c)(1). We agree. Accordingly, we vacate Cruz-Burgos’ plea and conviction and remand to the district court to allow him to plead anew.

We review de novo whether the district court’s Rule 11 plea colloquy with the defendant satisfies the requirements of Rule 11(c)(1) and whether the Rule 11 hearing was otherwise adequate. United States v. Alber, 56 F.3d 1106, 1109 (9th Cir.1995). The determination of whether a plea was voluntary is also reviewed de novo. United States v. Roberts, 5 F.3d 365, 368 (9th Cir.1993).

Upon review of the record of the plea proceedings, we conclude that the district court failed to explain the nature of the charges for which Cruz-Burgos was indicted, rendering the plea colloquy deficient. See United States v. Portillo-Cano, 192 F.3d 1246, 1250-51 (9th Cir.1999); see also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.