Lozano-Hernandez

United States v. Lozano-Hernandez

Good Law
4 F. App'x 450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 2001No. 99-50453; D.C. No. CR-98-01162-ER-1California245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Manuel Salvador Lozano-Hernandez appeals his 51-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Lozano-Hernandez contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 for a prior aggravated felony which was neither charged in the indictment nor admitted at his plea, but which increased his sentence above the applicable statutory maximum penalty, in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Lozano-Hernandez’s contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000) (concluding that Apprendi preserves the rule in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), that prior convictions are sentencing factors and need not be charged in the indictment, admitted on the record, or proved beyond *451 a reasonable doubt.)

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.