Paredes-Hernandez

United States v. Paredes-Hernandez

Good Law
4 F. App'x 484
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 2001No. 00-10389; D.C. No. CR-00-00039-HDMCalifornia279 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alfredo Castellanos Paredes-Hernandez appeals the judgment of conviction and his 90 month sentence following his guilty plea to a single count of being a deported alien *485 found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and (b)(2). Paredes-Hernandez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) on the basis of prior convictions for aggravated felonies that were not charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Parades-Hernandez also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001). Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed.

We remand for the limited purpose of directing the district court to amend the judgment to reflect a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.