Daniels
Daniels v. Cogswell
4 F. App'x 524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 2001No. 00-35299; D.C. No. CV-79-0651-HACalifornia79 words
Lead Opinion
*525 MEMORANDUM 2
Nine Oregon state prisoners appeal pro se the district court’s order denying their various post-judgment motions, including motions to reactivate a 1979 judgment to bring in new claims.
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order filed on February 17, 2000.
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.