Van Fossen v. Commissioner

Good Law
4 F. App'x 526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 2001No. 00-70933; Tax Ct. No. 11269-99LCalifornia155 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM 2

Roland Van Fossen appeals pro se the Tax Court’s decision dismissing for failure to state a claim his Petition for Lien or Levy Action brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (d). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482 (a), and we affirm:

The Tax Court properly concluded that Van Fossen’s challenge to his underlying federal income tax liability was precluded by his failure to file a petition for redetermination with the Tax Court pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6213 (a). Because he had received statutory notices of deficiency for the tax liability, Van Fossen could not subsequently raise a challenge to the underlying liability. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (c)(2)(B).

Van Fossen’s request to file his reply brief is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.