Rosa
United States v. Rosa
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Maribel Rosa pleaded conditionally to possession of pseudoephedrine with knowledge or reasonable cause to believe it would be used to manufacture methamphetamine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (d)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 , reserving the right to appeal from an order denying suppression of evidence. On appeal, Rosa adopted pursuant to Fed. RApp. P. 28(i) co-defendant Joseph Carl-Barjo Tydingco’s argument challenging the same order in his own appeal, United States v. Tydingco, 00-10014. We recently affirmed the district court in United States v. Tydingco, 00-10014, in a Memorandum filed January 23, 2001. We adopt the reasoning of that Memorandum, which is attached hereto as an Appendix, and affirm the judgment in Rosa’s case.
AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Carl-Borja Tydingco, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10014.
Submitted Nov. 17, 2000 3 .
Decided Jan. 23, 2001.
MEMORANDUM
Tydingco pleaded guilty conditionally to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), reserving the right to appeal from the order denying suppression of evidence. On appeal, he…