Banzon

United States v. Banzon

Good Law
5 F. App'x 673
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 2001No. 99-50437; D.C. No. CR-97-83-SVWCalifornia804 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

I.

Don Thomas Banzon (“Banzon”) purported to provide immigration assistance, legal advice, and ultimately documentation for individuals who wanted to legalize their status in the United States. In reality, Banzon participated in a scheme to defraud these individuals and the government by producing and distributing counterfeit immigration documents. He was indicted for submitting false statements to the INS; mail fraud; counterfeiting INS documents; inducing illegal aliens to enter the United States; and conspiracy. Banzon thereafter entered into a plea agreement with the government in which he agreed to plead guilty to six counts, including conspiracy to commit money laundering. In the plea agreement, he reserved the right to argue, at sentencing, that he should not be sentenced pursuant to the money laundering Sentencing Guideline because his conduct fell outside of the “heartland” of the money laundering statute. The plea agreement also contained, in a separate section, an unconditional waiver of the right to appeal. The district court rejected Banzon’s heartland argument and sentenced him pursuant to the money laundering Sentencing Guideline. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.