Morales-Alejo

United States v. Morales-Alejo

Good Law
5 F. App'x 731
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 2001No. 99-30370; D.C. No. CR-99-00167-02-REJCalifornia201 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Morales-Alejo, a.k.a. Louie Lira, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d), and unlawful possession of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony of the F.B.I. special agent. Defense counsel “opened the door” to this testimony by inquiring on cross-examination about the government’s plea agreement with the co-defendant, including the government’s promise to recommend a sentencing reduction. See United States v. Vaandering, 50 F.3d 696, 704 (9th Cir.1995). The government was justified in introducing rebuttal testimony to establish that the co-defendant’s sentence reduction was not unusual. See e.g., United States v. Rivera, 43 F.3d 1291, 1295 (9th Cir.1995).

A proper foundation was laid for the agent’s testimony because the trial judge questioned the special agent about his pertinent experience. Finally, the probative value was not substantially outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.