Arreola-Trasvina

United States v. Arreola-Trasvina

Good Law
6 F. App'x 590
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 2001No. 99-50711; D.C. No. CR-98-00808-JSL-1California233 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mario Humberto Arreola-Trasvina appeals his 57-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Arreola-Trasvina contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence 16-levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 for a prior aggravated felony conviction which was not charged in the indictment or admitted at his plea but which increased his sentence above the applicable statutory maximum penalty, in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. *591 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Arreola-Trasvina’s contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000) (concluding that Apprendi preserves the rule in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), that prior convictions are sentencing factors). The district court therefore properly considered Arreola-Trasvina’s aggravated felony in sentencing him although it was not charged in the indictment or proved beyond a reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.