James Mathis, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. James Mathis, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. James Mathis v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Good Law
75 F.3d 498·96 Daily Journal DAR 804·11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 564·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1044·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 486
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 199693-55390California3,921 words

Opinion

Opinion

75 F.3d 498 11 IER Cases 564 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 486 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 804 James MATHIS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. James MATHIS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. James MATHIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-55390, 93-55391 and 93-56215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1995. Decided Jan. 24, 1996. Kenneth E. Johnson and Gordon E. Krischer, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, California, for Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Barrett S. Litt, Litt & Marquez, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BOOCHEVER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge. 1 This case presents a question of abiding importance: How deeply may the government get involved in the actions of a private party before we subject these acts to constitutional strictures? For better or worse,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.