96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 545, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 883 Anthony Dewayne Mitchell Also Known as Mustafa B. Shabazz v. Clarence Dupnik, Sheriff of Pima County, Anthony Dewayne Mitchell v. Clarence Dupnik, Donald Robare and Michael Garland, Anthony Dewayne Mitchell v. Clarence Dupnik, David Bosman and Richard Fimbres

Good Law
75 F.3d 517
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 199693-16517California6,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

75 F.3d 517 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 545 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 883 Anthony Dewayne MITCHELL also known as Mustafa B. Shabazz, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff of Pima County, Defendant-Appellant. Anthony Dewayne MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence DUPNIK, Defendant, Donald Robare and Michael Garland, Defendants-Appellants. Anthony Dewayne MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence DUPNIK, Defendant-Appellant, David Bosman and Richard Fimbres, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-16517, 93-16955 and 93-17019. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1995. Filed Sept. 28, 1995. Opinion Withdrawn Jan. 26, 1996. Opinion Filed Jan. 26, 1996. Mustafa B. Shabazz, Arizona State Penitentiary, Florence, Arizona, in pro. per. Gerald Maltz, Miller, Pitt and McAnally, Tucson, Arizona, for defendants-appellants. Gerard M. Guerin, Deputy County Attorney, Tucson, Arizona, for defendants-appellants. ORDER The motion of Shabazz to file a late response to the County defendants' petition for rehearing is GRANTED. Shabazz's response is ordered filed. Shabazz's motion to strike the affidavit appended to the County defendants' petition for rehearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.