Zambrano

Zambrano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
7 F. App'x 618
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 2001No. 99-70864; INS No. A72-536-496California354 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Victor Zambrano petitions for review of the final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on June 17, 1999. Petitioner was served with an order to show cause (“OSC”) on May 26, 1995 — approximately six years and one month after he entered the United States. At a hearing on November 20, 1996, the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Petitioner’s application for suspension of deportation because he had failed to meet the continuous physical presence requirement before being served with the OSC and thus was statutorily ineligible for suspension. On appeal, the BIA affirmed.

Petitioner contends that he was eligible for suspension of deportation and challenges the BIA’s decision that the “stop-time rule” — a new continuous physical presence requirement set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”)— bars such relief in his case. Moreover, Petitioner contends that the IJ erroneously applied the stop-time rule to his case on November 20, 1996, more than four months before IIRIRA’s effective date of April 1, 1997. We agree that the IJ erred in applying the stop-time rule to Petitioner’s case before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.