UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Lee DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
76 F.3d 311·96 Daily Journal DAR 1685·1996 WL 61172·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2143·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 199694-10560California1,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Dennis Lee Davis appeals his jury conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1); conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846; and use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1).

Davis contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of his apartment. He claims the search was conducted before agents obtained a search warrant. He further contends the district court improperly instructed the jury on his “government authorization” theory of defense. Finally, he argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

FACTS

At trial, the evidence showed that a confidential informant told DEA Special Agent Richard McConnell that Davis was selling large amounts of methamphetamine. Agent McConnell instructed the confidential informant to arrange a meeting between himself and Davis.

Agent McConnell, acting undercover, arranged to meet…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.